Best Alternatives to SMART Goals for 2025

SMART is great, but it has become cliched. Many people assume they know what it means without ever thinking very carefully about it. That said, the science behind SMART is as relevant as ever.

The majority of the great discoveries on goal setting came from Professors Edwin Locke and Gary Latham. After two lifetimes of research these men partnered on a seminal book released in 1990 that summarized the science of effective goal setting. It is called “A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance.”

The book is full of insights and well researched ideas, but it doesn't have any catchy acronyms. Here is what the professors say about setting effective goals regardless of the methodology or acronym you choose.

‍

What replaces SMART goals?

While SMART goals have been a cornerstone of goal-setting methodologies across various sectors for decades, some organizations and HR professionals are seeking alternatives that better align with their evolving needs. The structured nature of SMART goals, which are Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound, can occasionally feel restrictive or inadequate when applied to dynamic and rapidly changing environments.

This has led to the emergence of other goal-setting methodologies, which offer flexibility and broader scope without sacrificing clear alignment with business objectives.

Introducing Alternative Frameworks

Recognizing the necessity to adapt to different organizational cultures and goals, several frameworks have been developed. Notably, OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) and PACT goals (Purposeful, Actionable, Continuous, Trackable) provide a robust alternative to the conventional SMART framework. These alternatives help accommodate a variety of strategic approaches and can even be personalized to fit the unique needs of a business.

Overview of OKRs, PACT, and Other Alternatives

OKRs promote setting ambitious and clear objectives with measurable outcomes. Unlike SMART goals, OKRs encourage reaching beyond what's easily attainable, driving innovation and growth.

PACT goals are designed to accommodate ongoing progress by allowing goals to be flexible and continuously trackable. This is particularly useful in settings where continuous improvement is a focus.

Additionally, other frameworks like FAST goals (Frequently discussed, Ambitious, Specific, and Transparent) and the WOOP model (Wish, Outcome, Obstacle, Plan) offer diverse approaches, emphasizing ambition and structured planning, respectively.

PerformYard is at the forefront of bridging traditional SMART goals with these innovative methodologies. By offering a versatile platform, PerformYard helps HR professionals track and manage a variety of goal-setting methods, ensuring alignment with business objectives and fostering a culture of achievement and accountability. With PerformYard, you can effortlessly integrate any of these frameworks into your strategic planning and performance reviews.

Are OKRs better than SMART goals?

When it comes to goal-setting frameworks, human resource professionals are often faced with a myriad of options to choose from. Two of the most popular frameworks are SMART goals and OKRs (Objectives and Key Results). Understanding their differences and how they can impact your organization is crucial for making informed decisions.

Definition and Components of OKRs

OKRs stand for Objectives and Key Results. The framework involves setting broad, qualitative objectives that define what you want to achieve. These objectives are paired with key results, which are specific, quantifiable actions to measure your progress towards the objective. This combination offers a flexible approach to goal-setting that encourages ambitious goals while providing concrete ways to track performance.

Comparison of OKRs and SMART Goals

SMART goals are structured to ensure that they are Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. They create clarity and accountability for individual contributors, which can help maintain focus on defined tasks. On the other hand, OKRs offer a more dynamic approach by allowing the objectives to be ambitious and aspirational, which can foster innovation and long-term achievement.

Whereas SMART goals are often used individually, OKRs are designed to align team and organizational objectives. This alignment creates a cohesive strategy where everyone understands their contribution to the broader goals.

Pros and Cons of Using OKRs Over SMART Goals

The primary advantage of OKRs is their ability to link individual performance with company-wide goals, enhancing coordination across departments. Additionally, they encourage setting challenging goals that can drive significant improvements and innovation.

However, OKRs can also present challenges. They require more effort in defining and regularly tracking key results. If not implemented carefully, they can lead to confusion and workload imbalances if ambitious objectives are not met.

Factors to Consider When Choosing Between the Two

When deciding between OKRs and SMART goals, consider your organization's culture, structure, and specific needs. OKRs may be more suitable for organizations with a flexible, collaborative culture willing to embrace risk and innovation. SMART goals, however, might be more effective in environments that value routine, clear expectations, and predictable outcomes.

Ultimately, the choice between OKRs and SMART goals depends on your organization's strategy and the outcomes you wish to achieve. Both frameworks offer benefits but in different contexts, so aligning them with your company's objectives is key.

What is an alternative to the SMART framework?

Introduction to Alternative Frameworks

As ubiquitous as SMART goals have become in various organizational settings, they aren’t the only method available for effective goal-setting. Organizations have diverse needs that may not always align with the rigid structure SMART goals provide. This opens up a need for exploring alternative frameworks that might better suit specific organizational dynamics and enhance productivity without compromising flexibility.

Alternatives such as OKRs, PACT, and FAST goals, as well as the WOOP strategy, present unique methodologies to cater to different end goals you're working toward. While SMART goals focus heavily on specificity and measurable outcomes, alternatives often emphasize dynamic engagement and iterative processes.

Detailed Explanation of PACT Goals

PACT goals define a framework centered on four key aspects: Purposeful, Actionable, Continuous, and Trackable. This approach is particularly beneficial for environments requiring ongoing adaptation and where constant evolution is paramount. The emphasis on continuity and actionability challenges employees to maintain a consistent drive towards advancing their objectives and optimizing processes along the way.

Purposeful goals zero in on the core mission and values of a task—ensuring that every action taken has intrinsic meaning and contributes to the larger organizational vision. Actionable goals translate intentions into clear, direct actions that can be easily initiated by team members.

Continuous indicates a commitment to sustained effort and long-term thinking, deterring the “set it and forget it” mindset. Lastly, Trackable means maintaining and assessing clear indicators of progress without the restrictive confines that some feel are associated with SMART goals.

Additional Alternatives Such as FAST Goals and WOOP

Other alternatives like FAST goals stand for Frequently discussed, Ambitious, Specific, and Transparent goals. This innovation in goal setting brings a modern twist by integrating frequent dialogues and transparency as integral components, which foster shared understanding and collaboration.

Meanwhile, the WOOP strategy—Wish, Outcome, Obstacle, Plan—introduces a more psychologically oriented approach to goal-setting. WOOP encourages individuals to visualize their ultimate goals, anticipate potential obstacles, and systematically plan how to overcome these hurdles, thereby offering a holistic and personal approach to professional goal alignment.

What is an example of a pact goal?

When it comes to goal-setting frameworks, PACT goals provide a refreshing alternative to the more traditional methods. These goals are defined by their emphasis on being Purposeful, Actionable, Continuous, and Trackable. This framework is particularly useful in environments where flexibility and adaptability are paramount.

Definition of PACT Goals

Each element of the PACT framework plays a critical role in shaping effective goals:

Purposeful

Goals need to be aligned with both personal and organizational missions, ensuring that efforts are not only productive but also meaningful. This means connecting the goal to larger business objectives to inspire and motivate employees.

Actionable

Rather than setting abstract targets, PACT goals are about concrete actions. They need to outline specific steps or activities rather than vague ambitions. This produces a clear roadmap that guides employees in their daily tasks.

Continuous

Ongoing refinement and adaptation help keep goals relevant regardless of how swiftly conditions change. Regular check-ins and updates are a part of this design, encouraging iterative progress rather than static assessments.

Trackable

Success is measured by tracking performance over time with clear metrics. This may involve using data analytics and feedback loops to ensure the trajectory remains aligned with strategic objectives.

Example of PACT Goal in a Business Setting

An example of a PACT goal could be in the context of a product development team within a tech company. Let’s say their overarching objective is innovation:

Purposeful: Enhance user experience through innovative features to drive customer satisfaction and retention.

Actionable: Implement bi-weekly brainstorming sessions and prototype three new features each quarter.

Continuous: Use customer feedback cycles to iteratively refine features before finalizing for release, adjusting the approach as new data emerges.

Trackable: Monitor customer satisfaction scores and feature usage analytics monthly to gauge the impact of innovation efforts.

This example underscores how PACT goals facilitate a strategic approach that anticipates and adapts to the complex dynamics inherent in modern enterprises.

Benefits of Using PACT Goals for Dynamic and Evolving Objectives

One of the main advantages of the PACT framework is its adaptability in addressing the ever-changing business landscape. Its flexibility allows organizations to stay agile, making it ideal for innovation-driven industries or any context requiring ongoing evolution.

Embracing PACT goals means promoting a proactive culture where continuous improvement becomes a standard work practice. By concentrating on actionable outcomes and iterative progress, businesses can foster a forward-thinking environment that thrives on operational proficiency and strategic foresight.

Transform your approach to performance management with PerformYard! Utilize our intuitive platform to integrate PACT goals seamlessly into your organization’s strategy. With tools for ongoing feedback and progress tracking, PerformYard empowers HR professionals to simplify processes while boosting employee engagement and accelerating growth. See why over 2,500 professionals trust us to enhance their performance management journey.

Additional Considerations:

‍

The Line between Success and Failure Should Be Crystal Clear

Great goals don’t leave any room for interpretation. There should be no ambiguity in what accomplishing the goal will look like. This is because corporate goals are a form of communication, they are about two or more people agreeing on a shared destination. If the goal isn’t clear it may not be aligning everyone in the same direction.

Additionally, unclear goals can have a negative impact on persistence. People will reinterpret an ambiguous goal to make their life easier just when things start to get hard. The S, M, and T in SMART all relate to having unambiguous goals.

Goals Should Be Challenging

A person should see their goals as difficult but achievable. This leads to the greatest efforts. When we believe we can achieve a goal but know it will be hard, we feel energized and excited about the prospect of succeeding at something meaningful. Conversely if we don’t see the goal as difficult we won’t be inspired by it, and if we believe a goal is too difficult we can become overwhelmed by it and give up before starting.

Note that all of this is about perception. Great leaders often convince the people around them to believe in audacious goals they might never have tried on their own.

We Must Be Committed to Our Goals

Part of the power of goals is that they focus our attention and increase our persistence. We are more likely to follow through when things get difficult if we’re trying to accomplish a goal. However, this is only true if we’re committed to that goal.

Organizations drive goal commitment in many ways, but the best option is to inspire employees to believe in the importance of their goals. When NASA was shooting for the moon, no one had to post the junior engineer’s goals on the bulletin board to keep him committed to the mission.

We Should Have the Necessary Skills

How much a goal impacts our performance is partly related to whether or not we already have the skills to achieve the goal. Goals are great at driving persistence, but they are not as good at driving creativity and learning. The impact on performance of a goal will be moderated by how capable we already are at achieving it.

The more we know about how to achieve a goal, the greater the impact goal-setting will have on our performance.

Effective Goals Need Control Systems

Goals can be too effective. They can become so motivating that they drive your employees to cheat.

That is why it is important for goals to come with control systems. It is not enough to achieve our goals, we must achieve them in the right ways. Effective control systems include a strong culture, well-articulated expectations, or oversight.

Whatever framework you choose, be sure that your goals include the scientific fundamentals of effective goal setting. Locke and Latham have much more to say about goals in their book, it's worth a read.